History of Previous European Currency Unions

The Euro feels like a novelty - but it is not. It wasScandinavian Monetary Union (SMU). The pattern
preceded by quite a few Monetary Unions inwas familiar: they accepted each others' gold coins
Europe and outside it.To start with, countries suchas legal tender in their territories. Token coins
as the USA and the USSR are (or were in thewere also cross-boundary legal tender as were
latter's case) monetary unions. A single currencybanknotes (1900) recognized by the banks of the
was or is used over enormous land massesmember countries. It worked so perfectly that no
incorporating previously distinct political, social andone wanted to convert the currencies and
economic entities. The American constitution, forexchange rates were not available from 1905 to
instance, did not provide for the existence of a1924, when Sweden dismantled the Union
central bank. Founding fathers, the likes offollowing Norway's independence. Actually, the
Madison and Jefferson, objected to its existence.countries involved created (though not officially)
A central monetary institution was establishedwhat amounted to a unified central bank with
only in 1791 (modelled after the Bank of England).unified reserves - which extended monetary
But Madison (as President) let its concessioncredit lines to each of the member countries.The
expire in 1811. It was revived in 1816 - only to dieScandinavian Kronor held well as long as gold
again. It took a civil war to lead to a buddingsupply was limited. World War I changed this
monetary union. Bank regulation and supervisionsituation as governments dumped gold and
were instituted only in 1863 and a distinction wasinflated their currencies, engaging in competitive
made between national and state-level banks.Bydevaluations. Central Banks used the depreciated
that time, 1562 private banks were printing andcurrencies to buy gold at official (cheap) rates.
issuing notes, some of them not a legal tender. InSweden saw through this ploy and refused to sell
1800 there were only 25. The same thingits gold in the officially fixed price. The other
happened in the principalities which were later tomembers began to sell large quantities of the
constitute Germany: 25 private banks weretoken coins to Sweden and use the proceeds to
established only between 1847 and 1857 with thebuy the much Stronger Swedish "economy"
express intention of printing banknotes to circulate(=currency) at an ever cheaper price (as the
as legal tender. In 1816 - 70 different types ofprice of gold collapsed). Sweden reacted by
currency (mostly foreign) were being used in theprohibiting the import of other members' tokens.
Rhineland alone.A tidal wave of banking crises inWithout a fixed price of gold and without coin
1908 led to the formation of the Federal Reserveconvertibility, there was no Union to talk of.The
System and 52 years were to elapse until the fulllast big (and recent) experiment in monetary
monopoly of money issuance was retained byunion was the East African Currency Area. An
it.What is a monetary union? Is it sufficient toequivalent experiment is still going on in the
have a single currency with free and guaranteedFrancophile part of Africa involving the CFA
convertibility?Two additional conditions apply: thatcurrency.The parts of East Africa ruled by the
the exchange rate be effective (realistic and,British (Kenya, Uganda and Tanganyika and, in
thus, not susceptible to speculative attacks) and1936, Zanzibar) adopted in 1922 a single common
that the members of the union adhere to onecurrency, the East African shilling. Independence in
monetary policy.Actually, history shows that theEast Africa had no monetary aspect because it
condition of a single currency, though preferable, isremained part of the Sterling Area. This
not a sine qua non. A union could incorporateguaranteed the convertibility of the local
"several currencies, fully and permanentlycurrencies into British Pounds. Regarding this a
convertible into one another at irrevocably fixedmatter of national pride (and strategic importance)
exchange rates" which is really like having a singlethe British poured inordinate amounts of money
currency with various denominations, each printedinto these emerging economies. This monetary
by another member of the Union. What seems tounion was not disturbed by the introduction (1966)
be more important is the relationship (asof local currencies in Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania.
expressed through the exchange rate) betweenThe three currencies were legal tender in each of
the Union and other economic players. Thethese countries and were all convertible to
currency of the Union must be convertible toPounds.It was the Pound which gave way by
other currencies at a given (could be fluctuating -strongly depreciating in the late 60s and early 70s.
but always one) exchange rate determined by aThe Sterling Area was dismantled in 1972 and
uniform exchange rate policy. This must apply allwith it the strict monetary discipline which it
over the territory of the single currency -imposed - explicitly and through the free
otherwise, arbitrageurs will buy it in one place andconvertibility - on its members. A divergence in
sell it in another and exchange controls wouldthe value of the currencies (due to different
have to be imposed, eliminating free convertibilityinflation targets and resulting interest rates) was
and inducing panic.This is not a theoretical - andinevitable. In 1977 the East African Currency Area
thus unnecessary - debate. ALL monetary unionsended.Not all monetary unions met the same
in the past failed because they allowed theirgloomy end, however. Arguably, the most
currency or currencies to to be exchangedfamous of the successful ones is the Zollverein
(against outside currencies) at varying rates,(German Customs Union).At the beginning of the
depending on where it was converted (in which19th century, there were 39 independent political
part of the monetary union)."Before long, allunits which made up the German Federation in
Europe, save England, will have one money". Thiswhat is today's Germany. They all minted coins
was written by William Bagehot, the Editor of The(gold, silver) and had their own standards for
Economist, the renowned British magazine. Yet, itweights and measures. Labour mobility in Europe
was written 120 years ago when Britain, evenwas greatly enhanced by the decisions of the
then, was debating whether to adopt a singleCongress of Vienna in 1815 but trade was still
European Currency.Joining a monetary unionineffective because of the number of different
means giving up independent monetary policy and,currencies.The German statelets formed a
with it, a sizeable slice of national sovereignty. Thecustoms union as early as 1818. This was followed
member country can no longer control its theby the formation of three regional groupings (the
money supply, its inflation or interest rates, or itsNorthern, Central and Southern) which were
foreign exchange rates. Monetary policy isunited in 1833. In 1828, Prussia harmonized and
transferred to a central monetary authorityunified its tariffs with the other members of the
(European Central Bank). A common currency is aFederation. Debts related to customs could be
transmission mechanism of economic signalspaid in gold or silver. Several currencies were
(information) and expectations, often through thedeveloped and linked to each other through fixed
monetary policy. In a monetary union, fiscalexchange rates. There was an over-riding single
profligacy of a few members, for example, oftencurrency: the Vereinsmunze. The Zollverein
leads to the need to raise interest rates in order(Customs Union) was established in 1834 to
to pre-empt inflationary pressures. This needfacilitate trade and reduce its costs. Most of the
arises precisely because these countries share apolitical units agreed to choose between one of
common currency. In other words, the effects oftwo monetary standards (the Thaler and the
one member's fiscal decisions are communicatedGulden) in 1838 and nine years later, the central
to other members (through the monetary policy)bank of Prussia (which comprised 70% of the
because they share one currency. The currency ispopulation and land mass of the future Germany)
the medium of exchange of information regardingbecame the effective Central Bank of the
the present and future health of the economiesFederation. The North German Thaler was fixed
involved.Monetary unions which did not follow thisat 1.75 to the South German Gulden and, in 1856
course are no longer with us.Monetary unions, as(when Austria became associated with the Union),
we said, are no novelty. People felt the need toat 1.5 Austrian Florins (this was to be a short lived
create a uniform medium of exchange as early asaffair, because Prussia and Austria declared war
the times of Ancient Greece and Medieval Europe.on each other in 1866).Germany was united by
However, those early monetary unions did notBismarck in 1871 and a Reichsbank was founded
bear the hallmarks of modern day unions: they did4 years later. It issued the Reichsmark which
not have a central monetary authority orbecame the legal and only tender of the whole
monetary policy, for instance.The first trulyGerman Reich. The currency Union survived two
modern example would be the monetary union ofworld wars, a devastating bout of inflation in 1923
Colonial New England.The New England coloniesand a collapse of the currency after the Second
(Connecticut, Massachusetts Bay, New HampshireWorld War. The Reichsmark became the solid and
and Rhode Island) accepted each other's paperreliable Bundesbank. The Union still survives in the
money as legal tender until 1750. These notesDeutschmark.This is the only case of a monetary
were even accepted as tax payments by theunion which succeeded without being preceded by
governments of the colonies. Massachusetts wasa political arrangement. It survived because Prussia
a dominant economy and sustained thiswas sizeable and had enough real power and
arrangement for almost a century. It was envyperceived clout to enforce compliance on the
that ended this very successful arrangement: theother members of the Federation. Prussia wanted
other colonies began to print their own notesto have a stable currency and introduced
outside the realm of the union. Massachusettsconsistent metallic standards. The other states
bought back (redeemed) all its paper money incould not deprive their currencies of their intrinsic
1751, paying for it in silver. It instituted avalues. For the first time in history, coinage
mono-metalic (silver) standard and ceased tobecame a professional economic decision, totally
accept the paper money of the other threedepoliticized.In this context, we must mention
colonies.The second, more important, experimentanother successful (on-going) union - the CFA
was the Latin Monetary Union. It was a purelyFranc Zone.The CFA (French African Community)
French contraption, intended to further, cement,is a currency used in the former French colonies
and augment its political prowess and monetaryof West and Central Africa (and, curiously, in one
clout. Belgium adopted the French Franc when itformerly Spanish colony). The currency zone has
attained independence in 1830. It was only naturalbeen in existence for well over three decades and
that France and Belgium (together withcomprises diverse ethnic, lingual, cultural, political
Switzerland) should encourage others to join themand economic units. The currency withstood
in 1848. Italy followed in 1861 and the last onesdevaluations (the latest one of 100% vis a vis the
were Greece and Bulgaria (!) in 1867. TogetherFrench Franc), changes of regimes (from colonial
they formed the bimetallic currency union knownto independent), the existence of two groups of
as the Latin Monetary Union (LMU).The LMUmembers, each with its own central bank,
seriously flirted with Austria and Spain. Thecontrols of trade and capital flows - not to
Foundation Treaty was officially signed only on 23mention a host of natural and man made
12/1865 in Paris.The rules of this Union werecatastrophes. What makes it so successful is
somewhat peculiar and, in some respects,maybe the fact that the reserves of the
seemed to defy conventional economicmember states are hoarded in the safes of the
wisdom.Unofficially, the French influence extendedFrench Central Bank and that the currency is
to 18 countries which adopted the Gold Franc asalmost absolutely convertible to the French Franc.
their monetary basis. Four of them agreed on aConvertibility is guaranteed by the French
gold to silver conversion rate and minted goldTreasury itself.France imposes monetary discipline
coins which were legal tender in all of them. They(that it sometimes lacks at home!) directly and
voluntarily accepted a money supply limitationthrough its generous financial assistance.Europe
which forbade them to print more than 6 Franchas had more than its share of botched (the
coins per capita (the four were: France, Belgium,Snake, the EMS, the ERM) and of successful
Italy and Switzerland).Officially (and really) a gold(ECU, the United Kingdom and Ireland) currency
standard developed throughout Europe andunifications.A neglected one is between Belgium
included coin issuers such as Germany and theand Luxembourg (BENELUX is the political
United Kingdom). Still, in the Latin Monetary Union,alignment which includes the Netherlands).There is
the quantities of gold and silver Union coins thatno real currency union here. Both maintain
member countries could mint was unlimited.separate currencies. But their currencies are at
Regardless of the quantities minted, the coinsparity and serve as legal tender in both countries
were legal tender across the Union. Smallersince 1921. The Belgian Central Bank controls the
denomination (token) silver coins, minted in limitedmonetary policies of both countries, with the
quantity, were legal tender only in the issuingexception of exchange regulations which are
country.There was no single currency like theoverseen by a joint agency. In both 1982 and
Euro. Countries maintained their national currencies1993 the two countries considered dismantling the
(coins), but these were at parity with each other.union - but this was not serious talk, the
An exchange commission of 1.25 % was chargedadvantages being so numerous (especially to the
to convert them. The tokens had a lower silversmaller partner).These three currency unions have
content than the Union coins.Governmental andall survived due mainly to the fact that one
municipal offices were required to accept up tomonetary authority has been responsible, at least
100 Francs of tokens (even though they werede facto, for managing the currency.What can we
not convertible and had a lower intrinsic value) in alearn from all this (not insubstantial) cumulative
single transaction. This loophole led to massexperience?(A) A dominant country is required for
arbitrage: converting low metal content coins toa Union to succeed. It must have a strong
buy high metal content ones.The Union had nogeopolitical drive and maintain political solidarity with
money supply policy or management. It was leftsome of the other members. It must be big,
to the market to determine how much moneyinfluential, and its economy must be intermeshed
will be in circulation. The central banks pledged thewith the economies of the others.(B) Central
free conversion of gold and silver to coins. But,institutions must be set up to monitor and
this pledge meant that the Central Banks of theenforce fiscal and other policies, to coordinate
participating countries were forced to maintain aactivities of the member states, to implement
fixed ratio of exchange between the two metalspolitical and technical decisions, to control the
(15 to 1, at the time) ignoring the prices fixed dailymoney aggregates and seniorage (=money
in the world markets.The LMU was too negligibleprinting), to determine the legal tender and the
to influence the world prices of these two metals.rules governing the issuance of money.(C) It is
The result was overvalued silver, export of silverbetter if a monetary union is preceded by a
from one member to another using ingenious andpolitical one. Even so, it might prove tricky
ever more devious ways of circumventing the(consider the examples of the USA and of
rules of the Union. There was no choice but toGermany).(D) Wage and price flexibility are sine
suspend silver convertibility and thus acknowledgequa non. Their absence is a threat to the
a de facto gold standard. Silver coins and tokenscontinued existence of any union. Fiscal policy
remained legal tender.This became a major(money transfers from rich areas to poor) are a
problem for the Union and the coup de grace waspartial remedy. They can mitigate and ameliorate
delivered by the unprecedented financing needsproblems - but not solve them. Transfers also call
brought on by the First World War. The LMU wasfor a clear and consistent fiscal policy regarding
officially dismantled in 1926 - but died long beforetaxation and expenditures. Problems like
that. The lesson: a common currency is notunemployment plague a rigid, sedimented union.
enough - a common monetary policy monitoredThe works of Mundell and McKinnon (optimal
and enforced by a common Central Bank iscurrency areas) prove it decisively (and
required in order to sustain a monetary union.Asseparately).(E) The last prerequisite is clear
the LMU was being formed, in 1867, anconvergence criteria and monetary convergence
International Monetary Conference was convened.targets.Judging by these requirements, the current
Twenty countries participated and discussed theEuropean monetary union did not sufficiently
introduction of a global currency. They decided toassimilate the lessons of its ill begotten
adopt the gold (British, USA) standard and to allowpredecessors. It is set in a Europe more rigid in its
for a transition period. They agreed to use threelabour and pricing practices than 150 years ago, it
major "hard" currencies but to equate their goldwas not preceded by serious political
content so as to render them completelyamalgamation, it relies too heavily on transfers
interchangeable. Nothing came out of it - but thiswithout having in place either a coherent
plan was a lot more sensible than the LMU.Onemonetary or a consistent fiscal policy.This
wrong path seemed to have been themonetary union is, therefore, likely to join its
Scandinavian Monetary Union.Sweden (1873),forefathers and remain a footnote in the annals
Denmark (1873) and Norway (1875) formed theof economic history.